« Democrats return to their roots [Back to Blog] Primaries Build the Party »

The City Council rejects Wal-Mart in Flushing

Once again the City Council gets involved when not needed or wanted, but this time it is hurting my home turf. As reported in yesterday's cover story in the New York Sun, the old Caldor on Main Street and Roosevelt Avenue was in negotiations with Wal-Mart to purchase and refurbish the lot, investing between $5 and $10 million. In the first instance, the project would provide local jobs in construction, retail, shipping and marketing. Plus the additional tax revenue and the benefits of low-cost shopping with a variety of products for consumers, it looks like a good thing to me. The project was set to start as early as July, and now it appears to be a dead deal.

Local Councilman Liu is quoted as saying "Wal-Mart is not welcome in Flushing anyway...the only purpose it would serve would be to displace economic activity, not supplement economic activity." Maybe Liu doesn't welcome Wal-Mart, but Flushing residents do, and of course millions of invested dollars would spur economic activity, who is he kidding?

But more importantly, it's simply not his place to intervene with private property. Maybe Liu wants to claim the property by eminent domain, and then sell it to his friends, for his own version of Wal-Mart. Either way, some members of the City Council seek to control economic forces in favor of a communist-style agenda.

Speaker Quinn described Wal-Mart as "liars" for essentially not requesting the City Council's permission for the project, first, and demanded "more information" from Wal-Mart concerning the Flushing location. These offensive and arrogant attacks on a private company serves no purpose to New Yorkers, it actually hurts us. When people are leaving New York City because of high taxes, restrictions and regulations on business, we should be welcoming a solid company like Wal-Mart into the mix. Wal-Mart does not need any special variances since the site is already zoned commercial. The City Council's unwarranted attempts to obstruct its progression, is just one more example of the City Council's failure to recognize when they're not needed or wanted.


by Raquel Walker, Thursday, Apr. 13 | Permalink



Why does the idea of an open-hand capitalist system so terrify the left? The only answer I can come up with is that somewhere deep in the pscyhe of the NYC left is some sort of devotion to a Marxist ideal that captialism is just the next step to socialism/communism. But hey, just look at how the City Council runs itself now. What's the difference? Why should we be shocked?

The only thing we can do is laugh at their hypocrisy. Just look at the Upper Left Side. All the mom 'n pop stores have been run out and now there are all the Starbuck's and GAPs you want. Because they need their high taxes to build all the NIMBY low-cost housing, they're moving Time's Square uptown. Good. They deserve it.

by Lee , Friday, Apr. 14

Posted by Lee
Friday, Apr. 14 - 11:25 PM




NYC republicans need to start campaigning on this important issue. Clearly, the democratic controlled City Council is impeding economic development, job growth and tax cuts with their blocking of stores like Wal-Mart & BJ Stores. Opening a Wal-Mart will not cost tax-payers any money. The new store will create hundreds of jobs and provide goods to consumers who will shop there and help our economy. With tax collection, more revenue will be made and the city can lower taxes to spur more growth and more development and more revenue and then even lower taxes, which will allow smaller businesses to hire and create more jobs and in the end, we'll all be happy. We'll be able to balance our budget with lower taxes, while having more New Yorkers working and spending to sustain economic growth.

It's a spiral affect in a positive way and we should preaching this to voters over the course of the next three years, so when 2009 rolls around, we can field candidates for City Council and get a larger republican representation in our city legislature.

by danielnyc , Tuesday, Apr. 18

Posted by danielnyc
Tuesday, Apr. 18 - 5:44 PM




I agree that support for Wal-Mart is a good rallying scheme to promote free enterprise.

It's important to note that many of those who work at Wal-Mart are part-timers that means they're teenagers, stay at home moms, or senior citizens, who otherwise have health insurance. And Wal-mart does offer health insurance policies to full time employees. If we choose to go to Wal-Mart, work at Wal-Mart, or make a purchase at Wal-Mart, it's our decision. They offer low prices in a high taxed city where every little saving counts.

Front page in yesterday's Sun, Wal-Mart reports that spending in surrounding areas, from NYC residents has increased by 30% from 2004 to 2005. Wal-Mart's poll shows that 60% of adults living in NYC support Wal-Mart. Further reported in the New York Sun, "Wal-Mart says every new store in NYC would create about 300 new jobs and generate about $5 million in tax revenue for the city."

The City Council are acting like hired guns for mob-style unions, by intimidating a private company from making a purchase that would create commerce, in favor of union bosses that line their pockets. Lee, you're right, liberals are complete hypocrites.

by Raquel , Tuesday, Apr. 18

Posted by Raquel
Tuesday, Apr. 18 - 11:11 PM