![]() |
||||
| Home - Blog - Meetings - Events - About - Contact Us - JOIN TODAY! | ||||
The City Council rejects Wal-Mart in FlushingOnce again the City Council gets involved when not needed or wanted, but this time it is hurting my home turf. As reported in yesterday's cover story in the New York Sun, the old Caldor on Main Street and Roosevelt Avenue was in negotiations with Wal-Mart to purchase and refurbish the lot, investing between $5 and $10 million. In the first instance, the project would provide local jobs in construction, retail, shipping and marketing. Plus the additional tax revenue and the benefits of low-cost shopping with a variety of products for consumers, it looks like a good thing to me. The project was set to start as early as July, and now it appears to be a dead deal. Local Councilman Liu is quoted as saying "Wal-Mart is not welcome in Flushing anyway...the only purpose it would serve would be to displace economic activity, not supplement economic activity." Maybe Liu doesn't welcome Wal-Mart, but Flushing residents do, and of course millions of invested dollars would spur economic activity, who is he kidding? But more importantly, it's simply not his place to intervene with private property. Maybe Liu wants to claim the property by eminent domain, and then sell it to his friends, for his own version of Wal-Mart. Either way, some members of the City Council seek to control economic forces in favor of a communist-style agenda. Speaker Quinn described Wal-Mart as "liars" for essentially not requesting the City Council's permission for the project, first, and demanded "more information" from Wal-Mart concerning the Flushing location. These offensive and arrogant attacks on a private company serves no purpose to New Yorkers, it actually hurts us. When people are leaving New York City because of high taxes, restrictions and regulations on business, we should be welcoming a solid company like Wal-Mart into the mix. Wal-Mart does not need any special variances since the site is already zoned commercial. The City Council's unwarranted attempts to obstruct its progression, is just one more example of the City Council's failure to recognize when they're not needed or wanted.
by Raquel Walker, Thursday, Apr. 13 | PermalinkWhy does the idea of an open-hand capitalist system so terrify the left? The only answer I can come up with is that somewhere deep in the pscyhe of the NYC left is some sort of devotion to a Marxist ideal that captialism is just the next step to socialism/communism. But hey, just look at how the City Council runs itself now. What's the difference? Why should we be shocked? The only thing we can do is laugh at their hypocrisy. Just look at the Upper Left Side. All the mom 'n pop stores have been run out and now there are all the Starbuck's and GAPs you want. Because they need their high taxes to build all the NIMBY low-cost housing, they're moving Time's Square uptown. Good. They deserve it. by Lee , Friday, Apr. 14Posted by Lee
|
Become a Member of the New York Young Republican Club Click here TO JOIN NOW! Thursday, July 10, 2008 Speakers Rachel Ehrenfeld American Center for Democracy R.S.V.P. more info SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER Keep up-to-date with all YR events! REPUBLICAN MARKETPLACE FastCounter by bCentral |
|||
| © 2008, New York Young Republican Club, Inc. | ||||