I agree with you wholeheartedly. Here's the problem: far too many Republicans (including some who read this very blog) disagree with the proposals you set forth in the second-to-last paragraph. They not only want to keep the immigrants out, they want to keep foreign products out and the jobs in.

"In the interest of national security" is the refrain, but where do we draw the line? Until we answer this question as a party, we may just continue the painful slide towards protectionism.

Republicans feel compassion for the "cause" of immigration. Many New Yorkers are immigrants themselves, children of immigrants, neighbors of immigrants or married to one. We don't, however, appreciate those who are calling for a "conquistador" or return of American land to the Mexicans. Fortunately for us, this is what's happening in California, not here.

It's important for Republicans to articulate the difference between immigrants who want to be law abiding citizens and those who do not. There is a pressing need to stop the incoming illegals, while providing some recourse to the ones already here.

We can't shrug off border security. I think American troops should patrol the southwest border to stop the flow of immigrants, undocumented and unknown. Current laws need to be enforced, and illegal residents, who want to stay, must be given the opportunity to become a U.S. citizen, as quickly as possible. That's the American way. I think most Republicans would agree with that.

Raquel:

You make some important observations. We shouldn't overlook the fact that we are a nation of immigrants but at the same time we shouldn't give in to foolish demands. Border security will come at a political price for everyone, guaranteed. But that's the nature of compromise.

As far as troops patroling the border, that kind of border enforcement is seen usually during states of war. Mexico and Canada would hear something from us if they put troops near our borders. We can make the our borders safe by making NAFTA stronger and getting Mexico to reform more of its labor, tax, etc. laws.

There may be a way of having a military presence on the border as opposed to "patrolling" it. I resort to this measure because relying on NAFTA alone to build growth in Mexico is wishful thinking. Some speculate that Mexican leaders encourage illegal immigration. I do agree that helping Mexico to achieve its own sustaining economy is worthwhile, and support NAFTA, but it's not enough, and it's not working.

In today's world, I don't think Americans should be taking any chances, and it would be foolish to think that evil predators are not trying to get into our country. The time to act is now, what are we waiting for?

Mexico might realize we mean business if they see an American military presence at the border. It is our laws, now enforce them. I think protecting our Nation, and stopping illegal immigration is more important than Canada's often irrelevant reactions.